<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br><br></div><div>On 19 Oct 2014, at 7:23 pm, Brandon Allbery <<a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com">allbery.b@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Chris Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jonesc@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk" target="_blank">jonesc@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Well yes, you do not have to reinstall everything after removal. The important bit is the removal step... ;)</blockquote></div><br>But the thing you complained about was exactly "remove or reinstall (...) as you see fit". It was not admitting to other possibilities, just saying you could choose to remove something instead of rebuilding it.<br clear="all"></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I read it as though the 'as fit' was applying to the whole process, so leaving the old ports as is, built for the old OS, was an option. That was the part I was commenting on. If that is not what was intended, then my mistake.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div>
</div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>