<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Barrie Stott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zen146410@zen.co.uk" target="_blank">zen146410@zen.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":18b" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">My worry now is that if run "sudo port -f deactivate netpbm" then that newly deactivated version of netpbm will no longer register as outdated so it will not be upgraded when I run "sudo port upgrade outdated". Will I not have to run "sudo port install netpbm" straight after my forced deactivation?<br></div></blockquote></div><br>"outdated" includes installed-but-inactive ports. "upgrade" does not save the active/inactive state of ports, so the result would be both installed and active... mostly because of this specific situation, since broken build systems that can't safely be used while a version is active are relatively common.<br><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>