<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:57 AM, René J.V. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com" target="_blank">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wednesday November 11 2015 08:14:59 Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:<br>
> > On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:15 AM, René J.V. Bertin <<a href="mailto:rjvbertin@gmail.com">rjvbertin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</span><span class="">> I believe most openssl dependent ports are not binary distributable due to the openssl license.<br>
<br>
</span>There is indeed some kind of restriction, but apparently not as severe as you think. The port-check-distributable.tcl utility shows curl to be just that, for instance.</blockquote></div><br>The default is nondistributable; there's an override that can be manually added because the OpenSSL license has some specific exemptions, and is not present in all ports that could use it. And because it is specific, some ports probably can't use it.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>