<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:woods.w@gmail.com" target="_blank">woods.w@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I agree, but “better license” has nothing to do with that, does it ?</blockquote></div><br>It is the license that blocks binary distribution, with specific exemptions. Oddly enough, licenses are not merely political noise; they actually have practical ramifications that need to be considered.<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div>brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates</div><div><a href="mailto:allbery.b@gmail.com" target="_blank">allbery.b@gmail.com</a> <a href="mailto:ballbery@sinenomine.net" target="_blank">ballbery@sinenomine.net</a></div><div>unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad <a href="http://sinenomine.net" target="_blank">http://sinenomine.net</a></div></div></div>
</div></div>