[MacRuby-devel] super_foo style RubyCocoa messages.
Pierce T. Wetter III
pierce at twinforces.com
Tue May 6 10:10:24 PDT 2008
>> It is, but I have to say that I always found the super_foo syntax
>> confusing in RubyCocoa. That's probably because I came to Ruby from
>> ObjC, not ObjC from Ruby... I kept wishing that:
>> super.foo() would work. Is that possible?
> Hi Pierce,
> That syntax wouldn't work because calling "super" will call the
> method you're in from the superclass.
> AND it may/will return an object. In your example you are calling
> #foo on the result object of the super call.
> But that would be the functionality I suggest yes.
> About the weird syntax in RubyCocoa, I agree.
> But this wouldn't be a compatibility layer without supporting it's
> intricacies now would it :)
Hmmm... Given that this is something where Ruby/ObjC (or for that
matter Java) butt heads, I wonder if there should be a better syntax?
superclass.foo() # call the superclasses implementation of foo()
I could probably learn to remember to type superclass instead of
> PS: Is it me or is the return-path for the emails coming from the ML
> incorrect? I guess it should point to macruby-devel at lists.macosforge.org
> instead of Pierce...
That happens to me as well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1590 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macruby-devel/attachments/20080506/77db5fe8/smime.bin
More information about the MacRuby-devel