[MacRuby-devel] [MacRuby][0.5] Which version of rake version to use?

[Conrad Taylor]

The ruby 1.9.1 rake does work without any issues but I wasn't 100% sure
because there's also a version of rake in
<PATH>/macruby-experimental/bin

-Conrad

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Laurent Sansonetti <lsansonetti at apple.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Our Rakefile-based system has only been tested with /usr/bin/rake, the
> version that ships with Mac OS X and that uses Ruby 1.8.
>
> I did not try with 1.9's rake (though it may perhaps work), and I am sure
> that it won't work with macruby's macrake (this explains your SEGV) for the
> moment.
>
> HTH
> Laurent
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Conrad Taylor wrote:
>
>  Hi, I was wondering, which version of rake should one use to build and run
>> the specs/benchmarks with?  I ask this questions because my default points
>> to
>>
>> /opt/local/bin/rake
>>
>> which is the version that's parts of my MacPorts install of Ruby
>> 1.9.1p129.  Also, I noticed that there's a version called macrake which
>> generates the following error on execution:
>>
>> Segementation fault
>>
>> -Conrad
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>> MacRuby-devel at lists.macosforge.org
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macruby-devel/attachments/20090705/a99bb3ed/attachment.html>