[CalendarServer-dev] Calendarserver 7.x compatibility with sqlparse 0.2.2

amaramrahul at users.sourceforge.net amaramrahul at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Dec 19 19:22:13 PST 2016


Ouch. So that essentially means that as a Debian package maintainer, either I'll have to package a compatible sqlparse version separate or wait for upstream to release a version that works with sqlparse 0.2.2. given the Debian release timeline, I believe the former is my only option in reality.

Thanks for the response. I'll check with other Debian mentors and see what I can do.

________________________________
From: Andre LaBranche <dre at apple.com>
Sent: 19-Dec-2016 11:15 PM
To: amaramrahul at users.sourceforge.net
Cc: calendarserver-dev at lists.macosforge.org
Subject: Re: [CalendarServer-dev] Calendarserver 7.x compatibility with sqlparse 0.2.2

Hi,

I think there is a compatibility issue. In this case, it's because sqlparse added a bunch of "new" keywords (from oracle) that conflict with identifiers we already use. We got as far as trying to retroactively rewrite all our *past* schema updates to be compatible (by quoting table / column names) but iirc that brings us out of sync with all existing CalendarServer DBs. Fixing that correctly would be a significant undertaking, requiring a schema update to rename everything. I think there may be a more hacky option of customizing the sqlparse keyword list at runtime to remove the conflicting keywords, but we didn't do that. I think there may have also been a problem around not easily being able to make that customization early enough and at the right layer.

Related: https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/calendarserver-dev/2016-November/001799.html

-dre

On Dec 18, 2016, at 6:50 AM, amaramrahul at users.sourceforge.net wrote:

> This is regarding https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848361
>
> I need to look into this but before I begin to debug the issue, I just wanted to do a quick check to see if there are any known compatibility issues of calendarserver 7.x with sqlparse 0.2.2? If so, is there a patch / commit id that I can backport?
>
> Sent from Nine
>
> _______________________________________________
> calendarserver-dev mailing list
> calendarserver-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/calendarserver-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/calendarserver-dev/attachments/20161220/6ee4235c/attachment.html>


More information about the calendarserver-dev mailing list