[CalendarServer-users] Performance and Parallel Requests to Calendarserver

[emport]

hi,


Andre LaBranche-2 wrote:
> 
> Yes, that is expected in your configuration, for this ancient version. In
> your version, there is a python software load balancer that distributes
> requests to available instances. You now have three available instances
> and not one, so it's expected to see additional listeners.
> 

ok, this sounds reasonable.


Andre LaBranche-2 wrote:
> 
> There is, however, one additional variable that affects concurrency, the
> config variable MaxRequests. 
> 

hm, where can i find this variable? i didn't see it in caldav.plist...


Andre LaBranche-2 wrote:
> 
> Just to set your expectation, doing such a large-distance upgrade
> successfully (when there is data to be maintained / upgraded) will be a
> lot of work.
> 

do you mean an upgrade from 2.4 to 3.x? i'm a little bit curios what you
mean by *a lot of work*. my naive approach would be: set up the server,
migrate all *.ics files and go to lunch :)

kinds regards,
emport


[i hope this post will not shown twice, if so i apologize....]
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Performance-and-Parallel-Requests-to-Calendarserver-tp34103740p34109685.html
Sent from the Calendar Server - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.