[CalendarServer-users] 9.0 upgrade -- sharing/groups
Dirk-Willem van Gulik
dirkx at webweaving.org
Fri Jan 13 05:25:27 PST 2017
I am trying to debug why groups/shared calendars seem to have gone AWOL on 9.0 — working with a stock install with the sample files only lightly edited.
With the sample test/admin pair accounts.xml (http://pastebin.com/RQ9b3RV0 for full version):
> <record type="user">
> <uid>AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390D</uid>
> ...
> <full-name>Super User</full-name>
> </record>
> <record type="user">
> <uid>AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390E</uid>
> ...
> <full-name>Test User</full-name>
> </record>
> <record type="group”>
> ...
> <full-name>Group 01</full-name>
> <member-uid>AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390D</member-uid>
> <member-uid>AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390E</member-uid>
> </record>
I nicely see a group01 with the right group members (http://pastebin.com/KBiMRQ5f for full version):
> • Group members:
> • -> (<RecordType=user>)AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390D - Super User
> • -> (<RecordType=user>)AEFBD20D-D975-11E6-9FB8-C86000BC390E - Test User
> •
> • Group memberships:
> • '()
> •
but nothing in the reverse- the membership() of the users (http://pastebin.com/4me8Dv2L for full version):
> • Group members:
> • '()
> •
> • Group memberships:
> • ‘()
Is it not fair to assume that members() and membership() are each others inverse ? Or am I barking up the wrong tree here.
Dw
More information about the calendarserver-users
mailing list