[darwinbuild] proposed binary_sites change
Kevin Van Vechten
kevin at opendarwin.org
Thu Sep 1 15:21:15 PDT 2005
On Sep 1, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Shantonu Sen wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2005, at 4:43 PM, Kevin Van Vechten wrote:
>
>
>> I believe this would eliminate the most common cases for using the
>> "-depsbuild" argument.
>>
>
> Yes, because you essentially end up putting all the inheritance
> tree on the command-line in the form of depsbuild arguments... In
> fact we should remove -depsbuild, since it's not clear where those
> builds would end up in priority after you've evaluated the
> inheritance chain based on the database.
>
Good point.
> We may want to start putting darwinbuild compatibility versions in
> the plist, to indicate the minimum darwinbuild/darwinxref you need
> to import a plist. The sooner we do this, the easier a transition
> will be in the future (and the lesser support burden).
>
Good idea. Does "compat_vers" appeal to you? Monotonically
increasing integer sound good?
- Kevin
More information about the darwinbuild-dev
mailing list