ld64 regressed?

[Eric Gallager]

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:07 PM, "René J.V. Bertin" <rjvbertin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Jun 04, 2014, at 20:51, Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> > Isn't 236.3_1 the broken one that failed to build? How did you manage to
> get it installed in the first place?
>
> I had an exchange (on here or via the bug tracker) and had even prepared
> my own patched portfile that version-locked to 136 on 10.6, but Jeremy
> pushed a patch very quickly that allowed v. 236 to build (with a minor
> version bump IIRC). I think there was even a binary build of it.
> I didn't keep trace of what I did since the issue was resolved "upstream"
> ... now I regret.
>
> Not that I have the slightest idea what we're missing out on, but newer
> should be better, right? :)
>
> René
>
>
Not necessarily, often times newer just means "newer" or "removed old
stuff"...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20140604/afef9997/attachment.html>