[MacRuby-devel] experimental branch: status update
Eloy Duran
eloy.de.enige at gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 06:09:52 PDT 2009
Ah, on that bike! (Which is a direct translation of a Dutch saying
meaning basically just "Aha!" ;-) )
Yes that sounds like an excellent idea, will do.
Thanks,
Eloy
On Apr 6, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
>
> On Apr 06, 2009, at 07:50, Eloy Duran wrote:
>
>>>> As Laurent noted we are now passing most language specs. The ones
>>>> that we don't pass yet are either because we simply fail, or
>>>> these examples (tests) are simply not updated for Ruby 1.9 yet.
>>>> Which as you all know is what MacRuby is based on. This is an
>>>> area where all of you Ruby devs can help out if you feel the need
>>>> to get MacRuby up and running asap but don't want to work on the
>>>> C(++) code.
>>>>
>>>> If there are people who would like to work on getting examples up-
>>>> to-date, please respond and I will try to give you an outline on
>>>> a workflow.
>>>>
>>>> If you just want to run the specs use the spec:ci task.
>>>>
>>>> One last question I have for everyone on the list. If there's
>>>> someone with a 32 bit intel machine, could you please please run
>>>> the spec:ci task and see if you get any failures?
>>>> It seems that, at least, because of a 32/64 bit issue some IO
>>>> specs are now failing on my machines and those of Laurent. Thanks
>>>> in advance!
>>>
>>> I am assuming the spec:ci task uses miniruby to run the tests
>>> currently, and will use miniruby or macruby in the future.
>>>
>>> Why not make a new task spec:ci32 that forces 32-bit execution on
>>> 64-bit machines using `arch -arch i386 miniruby` instead of
>>> `miniruby`?
>>>
>>> Just an idea.
>>
>> The question is not on how to circumvent these failures, rather the
>> question is _if_ these failures don't occur on 32 bit machines.
>> Laurent and I both only have 64 bit these machines and we see these
>> failures, whereas Patrick who apparently has a 32 bit machine does
>> not see them.
>>
>> The specs should ultimately pass on both archs, so we'd like
>> feedback from other people on 32 bit on whether or not they see
>> these failures.
>>
>> Eloy
>> _______________________________________________
>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>> MacRuby-devel at lists.macosforge.org
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
> Sorry I only meant to suggest this to aid in testing as you suggest.
> By adding a second task spec:ci32 that forces 32-bit execution of
> tests you and Laurent could see if the problem goes away when
> running the 32-bit code, even on a 64-bit machine. Hopefully if it
> works for Patrick and is tied to 32-bit it is tied to the code and
> not to the hardware, in which case spec:ci would still fail on your
> machine and spec:ci32 would work, which would then hopefully help
> isolate the problem with 64-bit.
>
> This also means spec could become a task that could test to see what
> kind of machine you are on, if you are on a 32-bit machine just run
> spec:ci, if you are on a 64-bit machine run spec:ci and spec:ci32 so
> that the 32-bit build always gets tested.
>
> Hope that makes more sense now.
>
> Jordan_______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
More information about the MacRuby-devel
mailing list