[Xquartz-dev] X11 2.1.0
jeremyhu at berkeley.edu
Sat Dec 1 23:55:08 PST 2007
On Dec 1, 2007, at 22:14, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
> (I don't like reply-to munging.)
> On 1 Dec 2007, at 19:41, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>> 3. We should probably refer to this package as "X11" (as opposed
>>> to X11User), because it includes parts of what would traditionally
>>> go into the SDK package (the man pages for functions, and the
>>> header files). That's perfectly fine; I see no reason to bother
>>> with splitting it into two packages.
>> Ok, I just noticed that the package was called X11User.pkg still in
>> the Leopard install, so I wanted to keep that the same... I'll
>> change it.
> I don't think this is a good idea. The idea here is to overlay the
> system X11User.pkg, not install another separate component. This
> package should include only what would go into X11User.pkg, not the
AFAICT, with Leopard, binaries are installed from
com.apple.pkg.X11User (main install) and headers are from
com.apple.pkg.X11SDKLeo (XCode 3).
I *really* don't want to maintain two separate packages, and I don't
feel right calling our package com.apple.*. It's a community
supported overlay of Apple's official releases, so I'm just going to
use org.x.X11 and combine both X11User and X11SDK updates. Does
anyone have any objections to that or know of any negative
consequences to doing that?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3040 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/xquartz-dev/attachments/20071201/d8e7e828/smime.bin
More information about the Xquartz-dev