[Xquartz-dev] 2.3.3-beta1

[Jordan K. Hubbard]

Do you have another OpenGL demo that actually demonstrates "speed of  
rendering" then?  Because they all look slow in comparison to 2.3.2 now.

- Jordan


On Feb 27, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:

> You're just not noticing it rotate.  It might look slow, but the  
> reported framerate is right.  If the gear rotates 721 degrees per  
> frame, it'll look the same as 1 degree per frame.  You can't "see"  
> the framerate in the demo... That's why it's printed ;)
>
> --Jeremy
>
>
> On Feb 26, 2009, at 23:57, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
>> So, I've just confirmed this problem on a MacPro with an 8800GT  
>> card as well as a MacBook Pro with built-in 8600GT.  The symptom is  
>> that glxgears claims high frame rates but does not actually animate  
>> with any speed at all (maybe 1-2 FPS).  With the shipping Leopard  
>> version of the X server, the same demo flies.
>>
>> - Jordan
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>>
>>> Aside from the server change, this release is almost the same as  
>>> the 2.4.0_beta1 release (meaning all the client side updates are  
>>> still present).  The only change outside the server is for  
>>> libpng.  libpng has been updated to address a security  
>>> vulnerability (another reason I want to get out another stable  
>>> release).  See the draft release notes for full details:
>>>
>>> http://xquartz.macosforge.org/trac/wiki/X112.3.3
>>>
>>> The dmg for the release is here:
>>>
>>> http://static.macosforge.org/xquartz/downloads/X11-2.3.3_beta1.dmg
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xquartz-dev mailing list
>> Xquartz-dev at lists.macosforge.org
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xquartz-dev mailing list
> Xquartz-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev